From Some Policemen together with a Moral
G. K. Chesterton
Points to remember:
1. Once the author was freely wandering inward a jungle together with was enjoying himself
2. In leisure, he started throwing a Swedish knife towards a tree trunk
3. Unexpectedly, ii policemen appeared at that topographic point from somewhere together with they arrested him almost
4. They got him entangled inward their complicated together with irrelevant questions
5. They defendant him of a murder endeavor on a tree
6. The author introduced himself inward exceptional proverb that he was a poet, a journalist, a author also
7. To prove, he besides recited a self-composed poesy form together with he besides said that he was staying alongside a famous personality of London
8. Hearing all this, the policemen disappeared from the scene
9. The author pose unopen to questions earlier him equally good equally earlier the readers
10. Was the author actually harming the tree, if so, then, why the policemen non arrested him?
11. Are the poets, journalists together with famous personalities complimentary from law together with allowed to harm anything?
12. If the author was proved to hold out a mutual man, would the policemen teach out him complimentary fifty-fifty then?
G. K. Chesterton was a journalist. He worked inward the "Daily News”. Once inward holidays, he went to Yorkshire. He was staying at that topographic point alongside a rich together with famous person. One twenty-four hours he was complimentary from operate together with was sitting inward a wood. He had a Swedish knife together with was practicing the fashion inward which people murdered each other inward Stevenson's novels. Unfortunately, he could never hitting whatever tree.
Suddenly ii policemen appeared from somewhere. They defendant him of murder-attempt on the tree together with started a detailed interrogation regarding unopen to relevant or irrelevant matters. The policemen entangled him badly inward the snare of their complicated together with irrelevant questions. They asked him who he was.
What the knife was, why he was throwing it, what was his address, trade, religion, visit on the Japanese war, shout out of his favourite truthful cat together with hence on. The author tried to convince them that he was a journalist together with was staying alongside "Mr. Blank of Ilkely'. The author produced an envelope, an unfinished poesy form together with another documents to evidence his statement.
All these things impressed the policemen together with they left equally chop-chop equally they had come. The affair of his beingness guilty or non was solved past times the fact that he knew unopen to well-to-do people together with was a journalist.
The author was quite amazed at his acquittal together with release. He asked the policemen why they had acquitted him when he was guilty of cruelty to a greenish entity.
He farther said that the policemen had rushed to him equally if he was unopen to villain of the Greek mythology who was trying to spoil a goddess tied to the dry reason together with equally if the huge tree was straightaway shattered into pieces. It was protesting against the cruelty of a man. His law-breaking could non hold out dismissed past times the fact that he was Chesterton, a journalist, a well-known somebody or that he was staying alongside unopen to wealthy people.
It made him intend that they powerfulness hold out fairies whose measure together with criterion of law-breaking together with penalization was dissimilar from the normal human standard. In their domain, it powerfulness hold out a law-breaking to harm a tree or a blade of grass. In these damage this effect could easily hold out explained but if the policemen were taken equally "real", the province of affairs 1 time to a greater extent than became confusing.
They arrested him because he was guilty of something hence they should guide maintain taken him to the constabulary station for proper proceedings. And if he was non the criminal together with hence why had they interfered alongside him together with defendant him.
This is what the author is nonetheless unable to understand. He thinks that if at that topographic point has been a pathetic human being at his place, who is homeless or who does non know whatever dignitary, what they powerfulness guide maintain done to him. Basically this essay is written to criticize the practices of policemen who enquiry the innocent but allow the criminals loose.
Also Read other Modern Essays of BA,Click BA English linguistic communication Modern Essays
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar